Critics of liberal media bias are livid about the unfair moderating at Sunday night’s presidential debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
In what is certainly one of the most glaring acts of journalistic malpractice in the modern era, neither candidate was asked to weigh in on the startling analytical revelation that President Obama may have engineered a hurricane using wind turbines and military force fields in a vengeful effort to destroy Trump’s luxurious estate at Mar-a-Lago.
Wow. Not a single mention of Obama’s hurricane conspiracy at the debate. #MediaBias
— Andrew Stiles (@AndrewStilesUSA) October 10, 2016
The debate was an explosive affair with a number of tense exchanges between the candidates. At one point, Trump suggest that Hillary should be in jail. Also, a fly land on Hillary Clinton’s face.
But there was no mention of the Mar-a-Lago hurricane that President Obama could have realistically order the U.S. military to engineer as part of his plan to rig the election for Hillary. There were no questions about what each candidate planned to do about the “clean energy” wind turbines — subsidized by the Obama administration — that could realistically be causing hurricanes.
And the moderators just sat there and let it happen.
READ OUR EXCLUSIVE ANALYSIS
TAKE THE POLL