With the fall of alt-right firebrand Milo Yiannopoulos — er, I mean, his ban from Twitter — come the enthusiastic cries of joy from the left. Censoring one of the right’s most controversial voices is apparently a victory in the eyes of those who put comfort over free speech.
Gamergate nemeses, liberals, and SJWs took to Twitter to make their arguments for why Milo should be off the platform for good.
milo yiannopoulos was not a "provocateur" or a "troll." he was a dangerous, chronically abusive harasser with a cult of neo-nazi followers
— Sarah Nyberg (@srhbutts) July 20, 2016
i'm enjoying gloating re milo as much as anyone but until twitter makes actual policy changes this single ban just makes him a martyr for BS
— Leigh Alexander (@leighalexander) July 20, 2016
Banning Milo from Twitter isn't an act against free speech, it's an act of removing a turd from a pool that most of us enjoy swimming in.
— James Martin (@Pundamentalism) July 20, 2016
Milo got banned from twitter? Why? He was such a gentle soul. ???????????? pic.twitter.com/LHv5fmoJFD
— Onision (@Onision) July 20, 2016
Milo was a threat to the free speech of the women & ethnic minorities he targeted in hate storms. His removal is a net gain for free speech.
— Ian Dunt (@IanDunt) July 20, 2016
If you are a man in media, consider restarting your brain & upgrading the OS before tweeting about whether or not Milo should've been banned
— Veronica de Souza (@HeyVeronica) July 20, 2016
I woke up to find Milo got banned from twitter, thank you for this wonderful gift
— Yonic South (@jephjacques) July 20, 2016
I'll repeat what my journo friend said about Milo: "He's the worst person I've ever Met. And I've met Robert Mugabe".
— Nick Pettigrew (@Nick_Pettigrew) July 20, 2016
let's remember milo the way he wanted us to pic.twitter.com/8TdEsC9E2t
— Brendan James (@deep_beige) July 20, 2016
RIP Milo. You will be missed by — well, not these folks…
